4.7 Article

Repression of KIAA1199 attenuates Wnt-signalling and decreases the proliferation of colon cancer cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 552-561

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.268

关键词

Wnt/beta-catenin signalling; tumour marker; colorectal cancer; proliferation; cell cycle

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The KIAA1199 transcript is upregulated in colon adenomas and downregulated upon beta-catenin knockdown. METHODS: Transcript profiling was performed on >500 colon biopsies, methylation profiling data were compared with transcript data. Immunohistochemistry assessed KIAA1199 protein expression in 270 stage II/III tumours (>3 years follow-up). The effects of stable KIAA1199 knockdown in SW480 cells (three different constructs) were studied using transcriptional profiling, proliferation and protein analysis. RESULTS: The KIAA1199 transcript was strongly upregulated in 95% of adenocarcinomas. Absent expression in normal mucosa correlated with KIAA1199 promotor methylation. Nuclear and cytoplasmic KIAA1199 protein expression was identified in colon adenocarcinomas and other types of cancers. A subpopulation of patients with tumours strongly expressing KIAA1199 in the nucleus showed a better outcome with regard to recurrence as lung or liver metastases. The KIAA1199 knockdown affected the cell cycle and the Wnt-signalling pathway. Reduced cellular proliferation and decreased KI67, phosphorylated retinoblastoma, beta-catenin and ASCL2 protein expression supported these findings. Eighteen Wnt-signalling genes differentially expressed upon KIAA1199 knockdown correlated with the KIAA1199 expression profile in clinical specimens. CONCLUSION: The KIAA1199 knockdown attenuates the effects of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling and it may thus be regarded as a regulatory part of this pathway. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 552-561. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.268 www.bjcancer.com Published online 19 July 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据