4.7 Article

In vitro and in vivo inhibitory effect of three Cox-2 inhibitors and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human bladder cancer cell lines

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 393-402

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.262

关键词

Cox-2 inhibitor; E-cadherin; SNAIL; EMT; bladder cancer

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659795, 21390462] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Although the anti-tumour effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitors in invasive bladder cancer has been confirmed, its mechanisms of action are unclear. Recently, the concept of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) promoting carcinoma progression has been suggested, and a key feature of the EMT is the downregulation of E-cadherin. In this study, we investigated the effect of Cox-2 inhibitors on reversal EMT and tumour growth inhibition in bladder cancer cells. METHODS: We used three Cox-2 inhibitors, etodolac, celecoxib and NS-398 and three human bladder cancer cell lines, T24, 5637 and KK47, in this study. T24 xenograft tumour mouse model was used in the in vivo study. RESULTS: Within the clinical drug concentrations, only etodolac showed the in vitro growth inhibition in T24 not in the other cell lines. Etodolac reduced SNAIL mRNA and vimentin cell surface expression, and induced E-cadherin mRNA and E-cadherin cell surface expression, in T24. Etodolac also most strongly inhibited the cell migration of T24 in vitro and showed the highest tumour growth inhibition in T24 tumour in vivo. CONCLUSION: Etodolac at clinical doses exhibited induced in vitro and in vivo anti-tumour effects and reversal effect of EMT in T24. These results suggest that etodolac is a good candidate for an anti-tumour or chemopreventive reagent for high-grade bladder cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 393-402. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.262 www.bjcancer.com Published online 12 July 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据