4.7 Article

miRNA profiling in metastatic renal cell carcinoma reveals a tumour-suppressor effect for miR-215

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 11, 页码 1741-1749

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.401

关键词

clear cell renal cell carcinoma; kidney cancer; metastasis; microRNA; miR-215; tumour markers

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) [20185]
  2. Ministry of Research and Innovation of the Government of Ontario
  3. Kidney Foundation of Canada
  4. Cancer Research Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm of the adult kidney. Metastatic RCC is difficult to treat. The 5-year survival rate for metastatic RCC is <= 10%. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to have a role in cancer metastasis and potential as prognostic biomarkers in cancer. METHOD: We performed a miRNA microarray to identify a miRNA signature characteristic of metastatic compared with primary RCCs. We validated our results by quantitative real-time PCR. We performed experimental and bioinformatic analyses to explore the involvement of miR-215 in RCC progression and metastasis. RESULTS: We identified 65 miRNAs that were significantly altered in metastatic compared with primary RCCs. We validated our results by examining the expression of miR-10b, miR-126, miR-196a, miR-204 and miR-215, in two independent cohorts of patients. We showed that overexpression of miR-215 decreased cellular migration and invasion in an RCC cell line model. In addition, through gene expression profiling, we identified direct and indirect targets of miR-215 that can contribute to tumour metastasis. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that miRNAs are altered in metastatic RCCs and can contribute to kidney cancer metastasis through different biological processes. Dysregulated miRNAs represent potential prognostic biomarkers and may have therapeutic applications in kidney cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1741-1749. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.401 www.bjcancer.com

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据