4.7 Article

Meat-cooking mutagens and risk of renal cell carcinoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 7, 页码 1096-1104

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.343

关键词

benzo(a)pyrene; heterocyclic amines; meat intake; African Americans; smoking; kidney cancer

类别

资金

  1. NIH, National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: High-temperature cooked meat contains two families of carcinogens, heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Given the kidneys' role in metabolism and urinary excretion of these compounds, we investigated meat-derived mutagens, as well as meat intake and cooking methods, in a population-based case-control study conducted in metropolitan Detroit and Chicago. METHODS: Newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the renal parenchyma (renal cell carcinoma (RCC)) cases (n = 1192) were frequency matched on age, sex, and race to controls (n = 1175). The interviewer-administered Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) included queries for meat-cooking methods and doneness with photographic aids. Levels of meat mutagens were estimated using the DHQ in conjunction with the CHARRED database. RESULTS: The risk of RCC increased with intake of barbecued meat (P-trend = 0.04) and the PAH, benzo(a) pyrene (BaP) (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, highest vs lowest quartile: 1.50 (1.14, 1.95), P-trend = 0.001). With increasing BaP intake, the risk of RCC was more than twofold in African Americans and current smokers (P-interaction <0.05). We found no association for HCAs or overall meat intake. CONCLUSION: BaP intake, a PAH in barbecued meat, was positively associated with RCC. These biologically plausible findings advocate further epidemiological investigation into dietary intake of BaP and risk of RCC. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1096-1104. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.343 www.bjcancer.com Published online 6 September 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据