4.7 Article

Whole blood-derived miRNA profiles as potential new tools for ovarian cancer screening

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 693-700

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605833

关键词

ovarian cancer; miRNA profiles; tumour marker screening; monitoring

类别

资金

  1. German Ministry of Research Education (BMBF) [01EX0806]
  2. IZKF Wurzburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Screening is an unsolved problem for ovarian cancer (OvCA). As late detection is equivalent to poor prognosis, we analysed whether OvCA patients show diagnostically meaningful microRNA (miRNA) patterns in blood cells. METHODS: Blood-borne whole miRNome profiles from 24 patients with OvCA and 15 age-and sex-matched healthy controls were biostatistically evaluated. RESULTS: Student's t-test revealed 147 significantly deregulated miRNAs before and 4 after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. Although these included miRNAs already linked to OvCA (e. g., miR-16, miR-155), others had never before been connected to specific diseases. A bioinformatically calculated miRNA profile allowed for discrimination between blood samples of OvCA patients and healthy controls with an accuracy of >76%. When only cancers of the serous subtype were considered and compared with an extended control group (n=39), accuracy, specificity and sensitivity all increased to >85%. CONCLUSION: Our proof-of-principle study strengthens the hypothesis that neoplastic diseases generate characteristic miRNA fingerprints in blood cells. Still, the obtained OvCA-associated miRNA pattern is not yet sensitive and specific enough to permit the monitoring of disease progression or even preventive screening. Microarray-based miRNA profiling from peripheral blood could thus be combined with other markers to improve the notoriously difficult but important screening for OvCA. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 693-700. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605833 www.bjcancer.com Published online 3 August 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据