4.7 Article

Dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 524-531

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606044

关键词

breast cancer; dietary patterns; factor analysis; prospective study

类别

资金

  1. VicHealth
  2. The Cancer Council Victoria
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council [251533, 209057, 504711]
  4. The National Breast Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Evidence is emerging that prudent/healthy dietary patterns might be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Using data from the prospective Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, we applied principal factor analysis to 124 foods and beverages to identify dietary patterns and estimated their association with breast cancer risk overall and by tumour characteristics using Cox regression. RESULTS: During an average of 14.1 years of follow-up of 20 967 women participants, 815 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed. Among the four dietary factors that we identified, only that characterised by high consumption of fruit and salad was associated with a reduced risk, with stronger associations observed for tumours not expressing oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR). Compared with women in the lowest quintile of the factor score, the hazard ratio for women in the highest quintile was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-1.21; test for trend, P = 0.5) for ER-positive or PR-positive tumours and 0.48 (95% CI = 0.26-0.86; test for trend, P = 0.002) for ER-negative and PR-negative tumours (test for homogeneity, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study provides additional support for the hypothesis that a dietary pattern rich in fruit and salad might protect against invasive breast cancer and that the effect might be stronger for ER- and PR-negative tumours. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 524-531. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606044 www.bjcancer.com Published online 14 December 2010 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据