4.7 Article

Incomplete follow-up of positive HPV tests: overview of randomised controlled trials on primary cervical screening

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 310-314

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605771

关键词

cervical cancer; screening; human papillomavirus; cytology; follow-up compliance; randomised controlled trial

类别

资金

  1. Olga and Esper Boels Fund
  2. Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond
  3. Augustinus Fonden
  4. Fabrikant Mads Clausens Fond
  5. Familien Hede Nielsens Fond
  6. Else og Mogens Wedell-Wedelsborgs Fond
  7. Carl og Ellen Hertz' Legat til Dansk Laege-og Naturvidenskab
  8. Kobmand Sven Hansen og hustru Ina Hansens Fond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that adjustment for incomplete compliance with follow-up in women with positive human papillomavirus (HPV) tests would be appropriate for estimating the true sensitivity of cervical screening with HPV testing. We assessed the compliance and its impact on >= CIN3 detection in all eight randomised controlled trials (RCT) with published baseline-round data. METHODS: We extracted data on recommended follow-up procedures, follow-up compliance, and >= CIN3 detection for both arms of each RCT, and assessed their correlation. RESULTS: Compliance with a direct referral for colposcopy was around 90% in all RCTs, whereas compliance with repeated testing among HPV-positive/cytology-negative women was around 60% in three RCTs and 73% in one RCT. Detection of >= CIN3 was significantly increased in two out of six RCTs with reported data. The correlation between compliance with follow-up in HPV-positive women and relative >= CIN3 detection was 0.48 (P = 0.33). CONCLUSION: There is at present scant evidence to support the view that the measured sensitivity of HPV screening is a simple reflection of compliance with follow-up. Adjustment of measured cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detection on the basis of compliance data may not always be justifiable, and if adjustment is made, it should be used very judiciously. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 310-314. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605771 www.bjcancer.com Published online 13 July 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据