4.7 Article

Open-label, phase I dose-escalation study of sodium selenate, a novel activator of PP2A, in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 462-468

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605798

关键词

prostate cancer; sodium selenate; PP2A phosphatase; anti-angiogenesis; phase I study

类别

资金

  1. Velacor Therapeutics Pty Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is fundamental to the progression of many solid tumours including prostate cancer. Sodium selenate is a small, water-soluble, orally bioavailable activator of PP2A phosphatase with anti-angiogenic properties. METHODS: This was a dose-escalation phase I study in men with asymptomatic, chemotherapy-naive, castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included establishing the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled. The MTD was 60 mg per day. Dose-limiting toxicity (fatigue and diarrhoea) was observed at 90 mg per day. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events across all treatment cohorts were nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, muscle spasms, alopecia and nail disorders. No grade 4 toxicities were observed and there were no deaths on study. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed. One patient had a PSA response >50%. Median time to PSA progression (for non-responders) was 14.2 weeks. Mean PSA doubling time increased during the main treatment phase from 2.18 months before trial to 3.85 months. CONCLUSION: Sodium selenate is well tolerated at a dose of 60 mg per day with modest single-agent efficacy similar to other anti-angiogenic agents. Further trials in combination with conventional cytotoxic regimens are warranted. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 462-468. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605798 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 July 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据