4.7 Article

Betulinic acid induces apoptosis and inhibits hedgehog signalling in rhabdomyosarcoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 43-51

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605715

关键词

betulinic acid; rhabdomyosarcoma; apoptosis; hedgehog; xenograft

类别

资金

  1. Horst Muggenburg Stiftung, Hamburg
  2. Bettina Brau Stiftung, Munchen
  3. Projekt Omnibus Stiftung, Munchen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma in childhood with the ability to resist apoptosis by the activation of survival promoting and anti-apoptotic proteins. METHODS: Efficacy of the apoptosis-inducing agent betulinic acid (BA) was determined in RMS cell cultures and in vivo by measuring cell viability, survival, apoptosis, hedgehog signalling activity, and neovascularisation. RESULTS: Betulinic acid had a strong cytotoxic effect on RMS cells in a dose-dependent manner. The BA treatment caused a massive induction of apoptosis mediated by the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway, which could be inhibited by the broad-range caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk. Exposure of hedgehog-activated RMS-13 cells to BA resulted in a strong decrease in GLI1, GLI2, PTCH1, and IGF2 expression as well as hedgehog-responsive luciferase activity. Intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg BA per kg per day significantly retarded growth of RMS-13 xenografts in association with markedly higher counts of apoptotic cells and down-regulation of GLI1 expression compared with control tumours, while leaving microvascular density, cell proliferation, and myogenic differentiation unaffected. CONCLUSION: Our data show that induction of apoptosis and inhibition of hedgehog signalling are important features of the anti-tumourigenic effect of BA in RMS and advices this compound for the use in a multimodal therapy of this highly aggressive paediatric tumour. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 43-51. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605715 www.bjcancer.com Published online 1 June 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据