4.7 Article

The low-molecular-weight heparin, nadroparin, inhibits tumour angiogenesis in a rodent dorsal skinfold chamber model

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 837-843

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605535

关键词

nadroparin; LMWH; angiogenesis; skinfold chamber; intravital microscopy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Recently, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were found to confer a survival advantage in cancer patients. The mechanism underlying this observation is unclear, but may involve inhibition of tumour angiogenesis. We aimed to examine the effects of nadroparin on tumour angiogenesis using a dorsal skinfold window chamber model in the Syrian hamster. METHODS: AMel-3 and HAP-T1 tumours were grown in donor animals and fragments implanted in the window chambers. Animals (N = 46) were treated with 200 IU of nadroparin or saline for 10 days. Repeated intravital fluorescence microscopy was performed to calculate functional microcirculatory parameters: number (N) and length (L) of microvessels, vascular area fraction (AF), and red blood cell velocity (V). Microvessel density (MVD), fractal dimension, and pericyte coverage were assessed histologically. RESULTS: Active angiogenesis was observed in control animals, resulting in a significant increase in N, L, and AF. In nadroparin-treated animals, however, N and L did not increase whereas AF decreased significantly. Both groups showed an initial increase in V, but nadroparin treatment resulted in an earlier decrease in red blood cell velocity over time. Compared with control animals, nadroparin-treated animals showed a significantly lower MVD and fractal dimension but significantly higher pericyte coverage index (PCI). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that the LMWH nadroparin inhibits tumour angiogenesis and results in microvessel normalisation. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 837-843. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605535 www.bjcancer.com Published online 2 February 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据