4.7 Article

Diabetes in relation to biliary tract cancer and stones: a population-based study in Shanghai, China

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 115-119

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605706

关键词

diabetes; biliary tract cancers; biliary stones; mediation modelling

类别

资金

  1. Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers are rare but fatal malignancies. Diabetes has been related to biliary stones, but its association with biliary tract cancers is less conclusive. METHODS: In a population-based case-control study of 627 cancers, 1037 stones, and 959 controls in Shanghai, China, we examined the association between diabetes and the risks of biliary tract cancer and stones, as well as the effect of potential mediating factors, including serum lipids and biliary stones (for cancer), contributing to the causal pathway from diabetes to biliary diseases. RESULTS: Independent of body mass index (BMI), diabetes was significantly associated with gallbladder cancer and biliary stones ((odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) = 2.6 (1.5-4.7) and 2.0 (1.2-3.3), respectively). Biliary stones and low serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were significant mediators of the diabetes effect on gallbladder cancer risk, accounting for 60 and 17% of the diabetes effect, respectively. High-density lipoprotein was also a significant mediator of the diabetes effect on biliary stones, accounting for 18% of the diabetes effect. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of BMI, diabetes is a risk factor for gallbladder cancer, but its effect is mediated in part by biliary stones and serum HDL levels, suggesting that gallbladder cancer risk may be reduced by controlling diabetes, stones, and HDL levels. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 115-119. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605706 www.bjcancer.com Published online 1 June 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据