4.7 Article

Self-sampling of the vaginal fluid at home combined with high-risk HPV testing

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 871-874

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605194

关键词

cervix; cytology; screening; HPV test; self-sampling

类别

资金

  1. the County Council of Uppsala
  2. Medical Faculty of the Uppsala University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Around 65% of women with cervical carcinoma in Sweden have not attended an organised screening. We therefore investigated the value of using self-sampling at home in combination with a test for high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) to increase participation. METHODS: A total of 2829 women 30-58 years old, who had not attended the organised screening for >= 6 years, were recruited. They were offered self-sampling at home (Qvintip) and recommended to send the collected vaginal fluid to a laboratory for analysis of the presence of high-risk HPV (Hybrid Capture 2 method). RESULTS: A total of 39.1% of the women accepted home sampling. These women disclosed a relatively high prevalence of high-risk HPV, which decreased with age, from 11.1% in women 30-39 years old to 2.9% in women >= 50 years. Follow-up disclosed histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) 2-3 lesions in 43.2% of the women with a persistent HPV infection, corresponding to 2.0% of the total number of participating women. The sensitivity of a single smear to detect the histological CIN 2-3 lesions were only 52.6%, even if all abnormal smears (atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS)-CIN 3)) were included. CONCLUSION: The use of self-sampling at home in combination with testing for high-risk HPV increases the participation rate of the organised screening and detects almost twice as many women with pre-malignant cell alterations (CIN 2-3) in comparison those with a single cytological smear. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 871-874. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605194 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 August 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据