4.7 Article

Down-regulation of frizzled-7 expression decreases survival, invasion and metastatic capabilities of colon cancer cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 1374-1381

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605307

关键词

frizzled-7; siRNA; colorectal cancer; metastasis; RhoA

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [17016049]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17016049] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The canonical Wnt signalling pathway is activated in most sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs). We previously reported that FZD7 functions as a receptor for the canonical Wnt signalling pathway in colon cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we examined the function of FZD7 in survival, invasion and metastatic capabilities of colon cancer cells. FZD7_siRNA transfection decreased cell viability of HT-29 and HCT-116 colon cancer cells. Expression of c-Jun, phosphorylation of JNK and c-Jun, and activation of RhoA were suppressed after FZD7_siRNA transfection into HCT-116 cells. In vitro invasion activity and Wnt target gene expression were also reduced in HCT-116 cells transfected with FZD7_siRNA. Liver metastasis of stable FZD7_siRNA HCT-116 cell transfectants in scid mice was decreased to 40-50% compared to controls. The mRNA levels of FZD7 in 135 primary CRC tissues were examined by real-time PCR. FZD7 mRNA levels were significantly higher in stage II, III or IV tumours than in non-tumour tissues (P < 0.005), and overall survival was shorter in those patients with higher FZD7 expression (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that FZD7 may be involved in enhancement of survival, invasion and metastatic capabilities of colon cancer cells through non-canonical Wnt signalling pathways as well as the canonical pathway. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 1374-1381. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605307 www.bjcancer.com Published online 22 September 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据