4.7 Article

Proton pump inhibitors and risk of gastric cancer: a population-based cohort study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 100, 期 9, 页码 1503-1507

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605024

关键词

stomach neoplasms; proton pump inhibitors; histamine-2-antagonists; risk; cohort study

类别

资金

  1. International Epidemiology Institute (IEI)
  2. Clinical Epidemiological Research Foundation
  3. Western Danish Research Forum for Health Sciences
  4. Karen Elise Jensen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to hypergastrinaemia, which has been associated with gastrointestinal neoplasia. We evaluated the association between PPI use and risk of gastric cancer using population-based health-care registers in North Jutland, Denmark, during 1990-2003. We compared incidence rates among new users of PPI (n = 18 790) or histamine-2-antagonists (H2RAs) (n = 17478) and non-users of either drug. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for multiple confounders. We incorporated a 1-year lag time to address potential reverse causation. We identified 109 gastric cancer cases among PPI users and 52 cases among H2RA users. After incorporating the 1-year lag time, we observed IRRs for gastric cancer of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-2.0) among PPI users and 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.8) among H2RA users compared with non-users. These estimates are in contrast to significant overall IRRs of 9.0 and 2.8, respectively, without the lag time. In lag time analyses, increased IRRs were observed among PPI users with the largest number of prescriptions or the longest follow-up compared with H2RA users or non-users. Although our results point to a major influence of reverse causation and confounding by indication on the association between PPI use and gastric cancer incidence, the finding of increased incidence among PPI users with most prescriptions and longest follow-up warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据