4.7 Article

Combination of adenoviral virotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy eradicates malignant glioma through autophagic and apoptotic cell death in vivo

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 100, 期 7, 页码 1154-1164

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604969

关键词

oncolytic adenovirus; brain tumour; glioma; temozolomide; apoptosis; autophagy

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA122930]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [K08-NS046430]
  3. Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy Young Investigator Award
  4. American Cancer Society [RSG-07-276-01-MGO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds) represent a novel treatment strategy for malignant glioma. Recent studies suggest that the cytopathic effect elicited by these vectors is mediated through autophagy, a form of programmed cell death. Likewise, temozolomide (TMZ), a chemotherapeutic agent used for the treatment of malignant gliomas, also triggers autophagic cell death. In this study, we examined the potential to combine the two treatments in the setting of experimental glioma. In vitro, pretreatment with TMZ followed by CRAd-Surivin-pk7 enhanced cytotoxicity against a panel of glioma cell lines. Western blot analysis showed increased expression of BAX and p53, decreased expression of BCL2 and elevated level of APG5. Treatment with TMZ followed by CRAd-Survivin-pk7 (CRAd-S-pk7) led to a significant over-expression of autophagy markers, acidic vesicular organelles and light-chain 3 (LC3). These results were further evaluated in vivo, in which 90% of the mice with intracranial tumours were long-term survivors (4100 days) after treatment with TMZ and CRAd-S-pk7 (P < 0.01). Analysis of tumours ex vivo showed expression of both LC3 and cleaved Caspase-3, proving that both autophagy and apoptosis are responsible for cell death in vivo. These results suggest that combination of chemovirotherapy offers a powerful tool against malignant glioma and should be further explored in the clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据