4.7 Article

Pemphigus vulgaris antigen mRNA quantification for the staging of sentinel lymph nodes in head and neck cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 181-187

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605470

关键词

diagnostic accuracy; Pemphigus vulgaris antigen; sentinel lymph nodes; immunohistochemistry; head and neck cancer

类别

资金

  1. Societe Francaise de Carcinologie Cervico-Faciale
  2. CHRU Montpellier AOI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnosis has been proposed to enhance the intra-operative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node (SLN) invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Although cytokeratin (CK) mRNA quantification with real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (QRT-PCR) has produced encouraging results, the more discriminating markers remain to be identified. METHODS: Pemphigus vulgaris antigen (PVA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), and CK17 mRNA were quantified using QRT-PCR, and the results were compared with an extensive histopathological examination of the entire SLNs on 78 SLNs harvested from 22 patients with HNSCC. RESULTS: SCCA and CK17 quantification showed significantly higher mRNA values for macrometastases (MAs) than for either negative or isolated tumour cell (ITC) SLNs (P<0.01). Pemphigus vulgaris antigen allowed the discrimination of all MAs and micrometastases from both negative and ITC SLNs (P<0.001). For the neck staging of patients, considering metastatic vs non-metastatic status, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis found areas under the curve of 93.8, 97.9, and 100% for CK17, SCCA, and PVA, respectively. With PVA, a cutoff value of 562 copies per 100 ng of cDNA permitted the correct distinction between patients with positive as opposed to negative neck nodes in all cases. CONCLUSION: PVA seems to be a highly promising marker for accurate intra-operative SLN staging in HNSCC by QRT-PCR. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 181-187. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605470 www.bjcancer.com Published online 8 December 2009 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据