4.7 Article

Inhibition of metastatic potential in colorectal carcinoma in vivo and in vitro using immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs)

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 803-812

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605206

关键词

lenalidomide; pomalidomide; thalidomide; metastasis; VEGF

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide and lenalidomide are FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and, along with pomalidomide, are being investigated in various other cancers. Although these agents display immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic and anti-apoptotic effects, little is known about their primary mode of therapeutic action in patients with cancer. METHODS: As part of a continuing research effort, we have investigated the effects of these agents on the metastatic capacity of murine colorectal cancer cell lines both in vivo and in vitro. Allied to these, we have studied their effects on the molecular pathways associated with metastasis. RESULTS: Results indicate that thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide significantly inhibit the metastatic capability of colorectal carcinoma cells. Anchorage-independent growth, used as a coarse indicator of transformation, was significantly reduced, as were migratory capacity and invasive competence. In addition, an in vivo experimental metastasis model also showed that treatment with the drugs resulted in a significantly lower number of metastatic pulmonary nodules relative to control mice. Allied to these cellular and phenotypic changes were alterations in molecular markers of metastasis and in intracellular signalling competency. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that in addition to their immunomodulatory effects, thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide can impair the metastatic capacity of tumours, and that this mechanism may involve alterations to cell signalling functionality. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 803-812. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605206 www.bjcancer.com Published online 28 July 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据