4.7 Article

Cohort study examining tamoxifen adherence and its relationship to mortality in women with breast cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 1763-1768

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604758

关键词

breast cancer; tamoxifen; adherence; mortality; community

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research (Scotland)
  2. Medical Research Training Fellowship
  3. MRC [G106/1164] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G106/1164] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing duration of tamoxifen therapy improves survival in women with breast cancer but the impact of adherence to tamoxifen on mortality is unclear. This study investigated whether women prescribed tamoxifen after surgery for breast cancer adhered to their prescription and whether adherence influenced survival. A retrospective cohort study of all women with incident breast cancer in the Tayside region of Scotland between 1993 and 2002 was linked to encashed prescription records to calculate adherence to tamoxifen. Survival analysis was used to determine the effect of adherence on all-cause mortality. In all 2080 patients formed the study cohort with 1633 (79%) prescribed tamoxifen. The median duration of use was 2.42 years (IQR = 1.04-4.89 years). Longer duration was associated with better survival but this varied over time. The hazard ratio for mortality in relation to duration at 2.4 years was 0.85, 95% CI = 0.83-0.87. Median adherence to tamoxifen was 93% (interquartile range = 84 100%). Adherence <80% was associated with poorer survival, hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.001-1.21. Persistence with tamoxifen was modest with only 49% continuing therapy for 5 years of those followed up for 5 years or more. Increased duration of tamoxifen reduces the risk of death, although one in two women do not complete the recommended 5-year course of treatment. A significant proportion of women have low adherence to tamoxifen and are at increased risk of death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据