4.5 Article

Reconstructing Breakage Fusion Bridge Architectures Using Noisy Copy Numbers

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 577-594

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0166

关键词

algorithms; combinatorial proteomics; computational molecular biology; dynamic programming; genetic variation; RNA; sequence analysis

资金

  1. NIH [RO1-HG004962]
  2. NSF [CCF-1115206, IIS-1318386]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1115206] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1318386] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Breakage Fusion Bridge (BFB) process is a key marker for genomic instability, producing highly rearranged genomes in relatively small numbers of cell cycles. While the process itself was observed during the late 1930s, little is known about the extent of BFB in tumor genome evolution. Moreover, BFB can dramatically increase copy numbers of chromosomal segments, which in turn hardens the tasks of both reference-assisted and ab initio genome assembly. Based on available data such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) data, we show here how BFB evidence may be identified, and how to enumerate all possible evolutions of the process with respect to observed data. Specifically, we describe practical algorithms that, given a chromosomal arm segmentation and noisy segment copy number estimates, produce all segment count vectors supported by the data that can be produced by BFB, and all corresponding BFB architectures. This extends the scope of analyses described in our previous work, which produced a single count vector and architecture per instance. We apply these analyses to a comprehensive human cancer dataset, demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the computation, and suggest methods for further assertions of candidate BFB samples. Source code of our tool can be found online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据