4.7 Article

Pharmacogenetic prediction of clinical outcome in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 1050-1055

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604671

关键词

colorectal cancer; oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy; DNA-repair genes; polymorphisms; pharmacogenetics

类别

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PI 05/1218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine whether molecular parameters could be partly responsible for resistance or sensitivity to oxaliplatin (OX)-based chemotherapy used as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). We studied the usefulness of the excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), XRCC1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms as predictors of clinical outcome in these patients. We treated 126 CRC patients with a first-line OX/5-fluorouracil chemotherapeutic regimen. Genetic polymorphisms were determined by real-time PCR on an ABI PRISM 7000, using DNA from peripheral blood. Clinical response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to each genotype. In the univariate analysis for CR, ERCC1-118 and XPD 751 polymorphisms were significant (P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively). After adjustment for the most relevant clinical variables, only ERCC1-118 retained significance (P = 0.008). In the univariate analysis for PFS, ERCC1-118 and XPD 751 were significant (P = 0.003 and P = 0.009, respectively). In the multivariant analysis, only the XPD 751 was significant for PFS (P = 0.02). Finally, ERCC1-118 and XPD 751 polymorphisms were significant in the univariate analysis for OS (P = 0.006 and P = 0.015, respectively). Both genetic variables remained significant in the multivariate Cox survival analysis (P = 0.022 and P = 0.03). Our data support the hypothesis that enhanced DNA repair diminishes the benefit of platinum-based treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据