4.7 Article

BAG-1 predicts patient outcome and tamoxifen responsiveness in ER-positive invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 123-133

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604809

关键词

breast cancer; prognosis; response marker; BAG-1; tamoxifen sensitivity

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Institute NSW
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  3. Petre Foundation
  4. RT Hall Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BAG-1 (bcl-2-associated athanogene) enhances oestrogen receptor ( ER) function and may influence outcome and response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. We determined relationships between BAG-1 expression, molecular phenotype, response to tamoxifen therapy and outcome in a cohort of breast cancer patients and its influence on tamoxifen sensitivity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro. Publically available gene expression data sets were analysed to identify relationships between BAG-1 mRNA expression and patient outcome. BAG-1 protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in 292 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and correlated with clinicopathological variables, therapeutic response and disease outcome. BAG-1-overexpressing MCF-7 cells were treated with antioestrogens to assess its effects on cell proliferation. Gene expression data demonstrated a consistent association between high BAG-1 mRNA and improved survival. In ER+ cancer (n = 189), a high nuclear BAG-1 expression independently predicted improved outcome for local recurrence (P = 0.0464), distant metastases (P = 0.0435), death from breast cancer (P = 0.009, hazards ratio 0.29, 95% CI: 0.114-0.735) and improved outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients (n = 107; P = 0.0191). BAG-1 overexpression in MCF-7 cells augmented antioestrogen-induced growth arrest. A high BAG-1 expression predicts improved patient outcome in ER+ breast carcinoma. This may reflect both a better definition of the hormone-responsive phenotype and a concurrent increased sensitivity to tamoxifen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据