3.8 Article

Interactions between an inflammatory response to infection and protein trafficking pathways favor correction of defective protein trafficking in Cystic Fibrosis

期刊

BIOINFORMATION
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 228-233

出版社

BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
DOI: 10.6026/97320630005228

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One unresolved issue in Cystic Fibrosis research is how functional loss of CFTR, a protein involved in chloride transport, results in chronic lung inflammation. Large scale experiments investigating protein or gene expression changes due to altered trafficking of the most common disease causing CFTR mutation (Delta F508) have produced long lists of changes with no apparent connection to inflammation. Likewise, experiments documenting the effects of inflammation in bronchial epithelial cell lines have yielded no insights into CFTR trafficking. We used MetaMiner CF to combine and analyze results of several CFTR trafficking and epithelial response to infection studies which were on different platforms using different methodologies and had different objectives. The program searches a manually curated database for published experiments linking proteins or genes and displays the interactions in a more easily understood graphic format. Numerous connections were established between genes documented to correct Delta F508 trafficking and a list of genes differentially expressed in bronchial epithelial cells after exposure to bacteria or virus. Of 34 genes documented to correct Delta F508 trafficking, 9 were directly linked by positive expression activation mechanisms to the immune inflammatory response. Looking at interactions among the results as a whole and in detail, it is apparent that an inflammatory response produces numerous changes which favor correct trafficking of Delta F508. One can take a view of the inflammatory process as potentially a corrective mechanism for dysfunctional on Delta F508 trafficking. This opens up a new research direction and provides new targets in the search for disease treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据