4.6 Article

Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 111, 期 5, 页码 711-720

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet213

关键词

chronic pain; meta-analysis; prevention; regional anaesthesia; systematic review

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), through CTSA [UL1TR000086, TL1RR000087, KL2TR000088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95 confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95 CI 0.200.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes 6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95 CI 0.140.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely. Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据