4.6 Article

Failed tracheal intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: 2 yr national casecontrol study in the UK

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 74-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes320

关键词

airway complications; failed tracheal intubation; anaesthesia obstetrics; incidence; laryngeal masks; UK Obstetric Surveillance System, UKOSS

资金

  1. UKCRN Portfolio study 7563 Obstetric Anaesthetists Association
  2. NIHR
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PDA/02/06/044] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are few national figures on the incidence of failed tracheal intubation during general anaesthesia in obstetrics. Recent small studies have quoted a rate of one in 250 general anaesthetics (GAs). The aim of this UK national study was to estimate this rate and identify factors that may be predictors. Using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) of data collection, a survey was conducted between April 2008 and March 2010. Incidence and associated risk factors were recorded in consultant-led UK delivery suites. Units reported the details of any failed intubation (index case) and the two preceding GA cases (controls). Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, significance P0.05 (two-sided). We received 57 completed reports (100 response). The incidence using a unit-based estimation approach was one in 224 (95 confidence interval 179281). Univariate analyses showed the index cases to be significantly older, heavier, with higher BMI, with Mallampati score recorded and score 1. Multivariate analyses showed that age, BMI, and a recorded Mallampati score were significant independent predictors of failed tracheal intubation. The classical laryngeal mask airway was the most commonly used rescue airway (39/57 cases). There was one emergency surgical airway but no deaths or hypoxic brain injuries. Gastric aspiration occurred in four (8) index cases. Index cases were more likely to have maternal morbidities (P0.026) and many babies in both groups were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: 21 (37) vs 29 (27) (NS). Three babies diedall in the control group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据