4.6 Article

Forced convective head cooling device reduces human cross-sectional brain temperature measured by magnetic resonance: a non-randomized healthy volunteer pilot study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 365-372

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem405

关键词

brain, cooling; healthy volunteers; measurement techniques, nuclear magnetic resonance; temperature, brain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This pilot study in five healthy adult humans forms the pre-clinical assessment of the effect of a forced convective head cooling device on intracranial temperature, measured non-invasively by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Methods. After a 10 min baseline with no cooling, subjects received 30 min of head cooling followed by 30 min of head and neck cooling via a hood and neck collar delivering 14.5 degrees C air at 42.5 litre s(-1). Over baseline and at the end of both cooling periods, MRS was performed, using chemical shift imaging, to measure brain temperature simultaneously across a single slice of brain at the level of the basal ganglia. Oesophageal temperature was measured continuously using a fluoroptic thermometer. Results. MRS brain temperature was calculated for baseline and the last 10 min of each cooling period. The net brain temperature reduction with head cooling was 0.45 degrees C (SD 0.23 degrees C, P=0.01, 95% CI 0.17-0.74 degrees C) and with head and neck cooling was 0.37 degrees C (SD 0.30 degrees C, P=0.049, 95% CI 0.00-0.74 degrees C). The equivalent net reductions in oesophageal temperature were 0.16 degrees C (SD 0.04 degrees C) and 0.36 degrees C (SD 0.12 degrees C). Baseline-corrected brain temperature gradients from outer through intermediate to core voxels were not significant for either head cooling (P=0.43) or head and neck cooling (P=0.07), indicating that there was not a significant reduction in cooling with progressive depth into the brain. Conclusions. Convective head cooling reduced MRS brain temperature and core brain was cooled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据