4.6 Article

Effects of norepinephrine and glyceryl trinitrate on cerebral haemodynamics: transcranial Doppler study in healthy volunteers

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 100, 期 2, 页码 240-244

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem374

关键词

brain, blood flow; pharmacology, agonists adrenergic; pharmacology, nitroglycerin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The effects of vasoactive substances on cerebral haemodynamics are not fully known. We studied the effects of norepinephrine and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on cerebral haemodynamics in healthy volunteers. Methods. The effects of norepinephrine (n=10) and GTN (n=10) on the middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAFV), cerebral autoregulation, reactivity to carbon dioxide, and estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (eCPP) were studied using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Established methods were used for calculating zero flow pressure (ZFP). Measurements were made at baseline, and after i.v. infusion of the study drug to the endpoints of 25% increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) for norepinephrine (0.02-0.1 mu g kg(-1) min(-1)), or 15% decrease in MAP for GTN (0.5-2.5 mu g kg(-1) min(-1)). Results. The MCAFV remained unchanged with norepinephrine, but decreased slightly with GTN {from [median (inter-quartile range)] 53 (38, 62) to 48 (33, 52) cm s(-1)}. Cerebrovascular reactivity did not change significantly with either drug. The eCPP did not change significantly with norepinephrine, but increased significantly with GTN [from 49 (32, 54) to 62 (47, 79) mm Hg]. ZFP increased with norepinephrine [from 39 (28, 48) to 56 (46, 62) mm Hg] and decreased with GTN [from 35 (30, 49) to 12 (-7, 20) mm Hg]. Conclusions. Norepinephrine, despite increasing arterial pressure, did not increase the eCPP. The eCPP increased significantly with GTN, despite decreased MAP. Cerebral vascular tone is an important determinant of CPP during pharmacologically induced changes in arterial pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据