4.4 Article

Experts' perspectives on the implementation of traceability in Europe

期刊

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
卷 112, 期 2-3, 页码 261-274

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/00070701011029138

关键词

Delphi method; Europe; Supply chain management; Food safety

资金

  1. European Commission [FP6-518451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The research presented in this paper aims at understanding the views of European food risk management experts on food traceability implementation, implementation of the general food law, and the advantages the system can offer for effective risk mitigation Design/methodology/approach - Delphi methodology was applied to understand experts' views on the efficiency of existing traceability systems in Europe following the implementation of the General Food Law An Internet survey was administered in two rounds, in order to elicit expert views on changes needed to current traceability practices, if traceability systems are to contribute to improved food safety Findings - Traceability was considered to be an effective safety- and quality-monitoring system with potential to improve safety within food chains, as well as increasing consumer confidence in food safety and consumer protection However, the results underlined the need for further improvements, particularly regarding the definition of food chain traceability, enforcement of regulations, and harmonisation of practice Research limitations/implications - Expert opinion regarding food traceability and its Implementation was confined to Europe and the impact of European legislation Further research at a global level is needed, given the need to trace food and food ingredients across the regional boundaries imposed by European legislation, the increased globalisation of food chains, and the need for pan-global harmonisation of food traceability legislation Originality/value - The results provide important insights into the advantages and shortcomings of the present European traceability approach enshrined in the European General Food Law

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据