Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the dominance of an ascetic discourse of veg*anism, in social research literature, and to relate it to a dominant hierarchical ordering of Western diets (to refer collectively to veganism and vegetarianism). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the extant social research literature on veg*anism was under-taken in order to discern whether a consistent type of descriptive language existed. This facilitated an understanding of the way in which that language is constitutive of research generated understandings of veg*anism. Findings - An ascetic discourse of veg*anism is dominant in social research. This is reflected in the phraseology used by authors. Typical descriptive terms of a veg*an diet include strict, restrictive, or avoidance. This ascetic discourse reproduces the hierarchical ordering of Western diets such that veg*anism is denigrated and made to seem difficult and abnormal. Research limitations/implications - Veg*anism arguably promises multiple benefits for human, environmental, and nonhuman animal well-being. The potential to realize those benefits is hampered by the perpetuation of an understanding of veg*anism as an ascetic practice. Originality/value - This paper provides the first comprehensive examination of the language used to describe veg*anism within social research. It can enhance reflexivity on the part of social researchers interested in veg*anism, and help inform research design. In providing an alternative hedonic discourse of veg*anism, this paper also makes a contribution towards realizing the potential benefits of veg*anism through making it a more attractive dietary practice.