4.6 Article

Selective Targeting of Extracellular Insulin-Degrading Enzyme by Quasi-Irreversible Thiol-Modifying Inhibitors

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 2716-2724

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00334

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DA024888, U54 MH084512]
  2. American Diabetes Association [7-11-CD-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many therapeutically important enzymes are,, present in Multiple cellular, compartments, Where they can. carry out markedly different functions; thus; there is a need for,, pharmacological strategies to selectively manipulate distinct:, pools of target enzymes. Insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) is :a thiol-sensitive zinc-metallopepitidase that hydrolyzes diverse, peptide substrates in both the cytosol and the extracellular, space, but current genetic-and pharmacological, approaches are incapable of selectively inhibiting the protease in specific subcellular compartments. Here, we describe the discovery,characterization, and kinetics-based optimization of potent benzoisothiazolone-based inhibitors that, by Virtue of a unique quasi irreversible mode of inhibition, exclusively inhibit extracellular IDE. The mechanism of inhibition involves nucleophilic attack by a specific active site thiol the enzyme on the inhibitors, which bear an isothiazolone ring that undergoes irreversible ring opening with the formation of a disulfide bond. Notably, binding of the-inhibitors is reversible under reducing conditions, thus restricting inhibition to IDE present in the extracellular space. The identified inhibitors are highly potent (IC50app = 63 nM), nontoxic at concentrations up to 100 mu M, and appear to preferentially target a specific cysteine residue within IDE. These novel inhibitors represent powerful new tools for clarifying the physiological and pathophysiological roles of this poorly understood protease; and their unusual mechanism of action should be applicable to other therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据