期刊
COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 397-418出版社
BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
关键词
QCA; fuzzy sets; good practice; data analysis; research approach; comparative methods
类别
As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a good QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据