3.8 Article

Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

期刊

COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 397-418

出版社

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/156913210X12493538729793

关键词

QCA; fuzzy sets; good practice; data analysis; research approach; comparative methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a good QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据