4.6 Article

FRP-Confined Concrete Composite Retrofit System for Structural Steel Columns

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000543

关键词

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); Retrofit; Composite column; Fiber-reinforced polymer tube; Shrinkage-reducing admixture; Steel column

资金

  1. McMaster University Centre for Effective Design of Structures (CEDS) through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research & Innovation (MRI)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined concrete-steel composite columns have been recently introduced as a retrofit technique for structural steel columns. This technique involves placing a two-part FRP tube around an existing steel column and subsequently filling the void between the steel section and the FRP tube with concrete to create a composite column. The composite action occurs due to the concrete encasing the steel section and the FRP confining the concrete. Within this focus, an experimental investigation has been undertaken with the objectives of evaluating the effect of adding confined concrete to encase a steel W section, the effect of using a split-tube system as a practical encasement technique, and the effect of adding shrinkage-reducing admixtures (SRA) to the confined concrete. A total of 18 stub columns comprising six different column types were tested to achieve these objectives. The test results showed that the load-displacement response of the composite columns was similar to that of confined concrete combined with the elastic-perfectly plastic steel contribution. The experimental findings also demonstrated the enhanced composite column performance, including a significant increase in the ultimate capacity using the proposed split-tube retrofit technique. The results also indicated that the use of a SRA in confined concrete has an indistinguishable effect on the confined concrete strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据