3.9 Article

IMPROVING GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS VIA BACKCROSS PROCEDURE

期刊

MAYDICA
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 145-153

出版社

MAYDICA-IST SPER CEREALICOLTUR

关键词

Maize (Zen may L.) breeding; Consecutive backcross procedure with key agronomic trait selection; General combining ability (GCA); Specific combining ability (SCA); Quantitative trait improvement; Grain yield and yield components

资金

  1. Yunnan advanced talent introduction project foundation [20080A006]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2009CB126003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transferring a quantitative trait from a donor maize (Zen may L.) line into a local elite line is an important way to improve local maize line. A backcross procedure is widely used method for this purpose. However, little knowledge exists on how effective a backcross procedure is for improving one and/or multiple quantitative traits of maize. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the backcross generations at which a quantitative trait was recovered to a similar homozygous level of recurrent parent; 2) investigate if multiple quantitative traits can be transferred from a donor line into a local elite line in a consecutive backcross procedure. 3) evaluate if the parental lines' mean, GCA, and SCA effects impact on the changes in the studied traits at different backcross generations. The results had shown that four consecutive backcross generations are necessary to make a new line recover to similar homozygous level of recurrent parent in the studied quantitative traits. Multiple quantitative traits from exotic donor line have been successfully transferred into the new line by the consecutive backcross procedure incorporated with key agronomic trait selection. A maize line with high means from recurrent parent lines (RPL) and high positive GCA effects from both parent lines is preferred to SCA effect in a cross for improving quantitative traits of a recipient line because fixation of additive genes can occur in consecutive backcross generations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据