4.7 Article

Evidence for short-time divergence and long-time conservation of tissue-specific expression after gene duplication

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 442-448

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr022

关键词

Gene duplication; paralogy; orthology; tissue expression; functional divergence

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BFU2009-09168, JCI2010-07614]
  2. European Science Foundation (ESF)
  3. Frontiers of Functional Genomics program
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  5. GVA-FEDER [PROMETEO/2010/001]
  6. [BIO BIO2008-04212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene duplication is one of the main mechanisms by which genomes can acquire novel functions. It has been proposed that the retention of gene duplicates can be associated to processes of tissue expression divergence. These models predict that acquisition of divergent expression patterns should be acquired shortly after the duplication, and that larger divergence in tissue expression would be expected for paralogs, as compared to orthologs of a similar age. Many studies have shown that gene duplicates tend to have divergent expression patterns and that gene family expansions are associated with high levels of tissue specificity. However, the timeframe in which these processes occur have rarely been investigated in detail, particularly in vertebrates, and most analyses do not include direct comparisons of orthologs as a baseline for the expected levels of tissue specificity in absence of duplications. To assess the specific contribution of duplications to expression divergence, we combine here phylogenetic analyses and expression data from human and mouse. In particular, we study differences in spatial expression among human-mouse paralogs, specifically duplicated after the radiation of mammals, and compare them to pairs of orthologs in the same species. Our results show that gene duplication leads to increased levels of tissue specificity and that this tends to occur promptly after the duplication event.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据