4.1 Article

Right Ventricular Beneficial Effects of Intracoronary SERCA(2a) Gene Transfer in an Experimental Model of Heart Failure

期刊

FOLIA BIOLOGICA
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 1-8

出版社

CHARLES UNIV PRAGUE, FIRST FACULTY MEDICINE

关键词

heart failure; pharmacogenomics; calcium metabolism

资金

  1. Department of Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SERCA gene transfer ameliorates heart failure pathologic processes in left ventricular myocardium. We sought to assess the simultaneous molecular changes that occur in the right ventricle. Sprague-Dawley rats underwent aortic banding and were followed by echocardiography for development of heart failure. After a decrease in fractional shortening of 25% from baseline, intracoronary injection of adenoviral-SERCA(2a) or adenoviral-beta-galactosidase was performed. Successful gene transfer was confirmed by immunoblotting. Rats were randomly euthanized on post-operative day 7 or 21. Protein analysis including right ventricular levels of SERCA(2a) beta ARK1, inflammatory mediators (IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha), apoptotic markers (Bax, Bak and Bcl-2) and MAPK ( Ink, p38 and Erk) was performed. Adenoviral-SERCA(2a)-treated animals showed increased right ventricular expression of SERCA(2a) compared with controls. Decreased levels of inflammatory markers were also demonstrated in this group. Expression of pro-apoptotic markers was similarly improved. Levels of MAPK were increased compared with the control group. These differences were most significant 7 days after gene transfer, but the majority of these changes persisted at 21 days. These results suggest that attenuation of pathologic mechanisms of calcium cycling, inflammation and apoptosis also occur in the right ventricular myocardium after SERCA(2a) gene transfer during heart failure. These findings support a therapeutic role for genetic manipulation of this pathway in patients with right ventricular or biventricular failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据