4.2 Article

Self-Reported Cognitive Impairment After Breast Cancer Treatment in Young Women from the ELIPPSE40 Cohort: The Long-Term Impact of Chemotherapy

期刊

BREAST JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 406-414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01275.x

关键词

cognitive impairment; chemotherapy; longitudinal study; young women

资金

  1. Regional Council (Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, France)
  2. Research Ministry (FNS)
  3. General Direction of Health (DGS)
  4. National Institute of Cancer (INCa)
  5. charity organization Fondation de France
  6. charity organization Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common after cancer treatments, but little is known about the long-term evolution of CI, especially in premenopausal women. Since September 2005, all consecutive women included in the French National Health Insurance Fund registry with a diagnosis of primary breast cancer, aged 1840 years and living in South Eastern France, were asked to participate in a cohort study, including telephone interviews, medical data, and prescription refills of psychotropic drugs and adjuvant endocrine therapy. At each interview, CI is defined as self-report of frequent memory loss and attention deficits. As of February 2010, 222 women with available medical data had taken part in the 10-, 16-, and 28-month telephone interviews, with CI being reported by 37.4%, 36.5%, and 42.3% of participants, respectively. Tranquilizers dispensation was associated with CI self-report at all three interviews; chemotherapy was reported only at the 28-month interview. At 28 months, besides chemotherapy and tranquilizers dispensation, having a low educational level and not being a native French woman were also independently associated with CI. Reports of CI were common in young women and primarily related to psycho-social vulnerabilities and cancer treatment. As they affect quality of life, long-term CI complaints deserve greater consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据