4.1 Article

The Role of Chemokines in Migration of Metastatic-like Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Cells

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 387-394

出版社

BEGELL HOUSE INC
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v30.i4.40

关键词

cell motility; chemokines; chemokine receptors; cystic lung disease; lymphangioleiomyomatosis; metastasis; mammalian target of rapamycin; smooth muscle cells; tuberous sclerosis complex

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL002541] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 HL002541-12, Z01 HL002541-13, ZIA HL002541-14] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare cystic lung disease with multi-organ involvement, occurs primarily in women of childbearing age. LAM can present sporadically or in association with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Loss of lung function in patients with LAM can be attributed to the dysregulated growth of LAM cells, with dysfunctional TSC1 or TSC2 genes, which encode hamartin and tuberin, respectively, leading to hyperactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). LAM cells are smooth muscle-like cells that express melanoma antigens such as gp100, a splice variant of the Pmel17 gene. Tuberin and hamartin form heterodimers that act as negative regulators of mTOR. Lack of TSC2 function, as occurs in LAM cells, leads to the production of the chemokine CCL2/monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), which increases LAM cell mobility. Although many chemokines and their receptors could influence LAM cell mobilization, we propose that a positive-feedback loop is generated when dysfunctional TSC2 is present in LAM cells. We identified a group of chemokine receptors that is expressed in LAM cells and differs from those on smooth muscle and melanoma cells (Malme-3M). Chemokines have been implicated in tumor metastasis, and our data suggest a role for chemokines in LAM cell mobilization and thereby in the pathogenesis of LAM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据