4.5 Review

Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 172, 期 3, 页码 523-537

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4937-1

关键词

Breast cancer surgery; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Immediate breast reconstruction

类别

资金

  1. Swiss Cancer League
  2. Swiss Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research
  4. Sandoz
  5. Roche
  6. University Hospital Basel
  7. Kiechle Orthopadie Technik
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeIndications for nipple-sparing mastectomy(NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion.MethodsThe panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology.ResultsConsensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference.ConclusionsIn case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据