4.5 Review

Racial disparities in chemotherapy administration for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 172, 期 2, 页码 247-263

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4909-5

关键词

Race; Disparities; Chemotherapy administration; Delays; Relative dose intensity

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to measure the extent to which race is associated with delayed initiation or receipt of inadequate chemotherapy among women with early-stage breast cancer.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of all articles published from January 1987 until June 2017 within four databases: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Eligible studies were US-based and examined the influence of race on chemotherapy delays, cessation, or dose reductions among women with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. Data were pooled using a random effects model.ResultsA total of twelve studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to have delays to initiation of adjuvant therapy of 90 days or more (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.87; X-2 = 31.05, p<0.00001; I-2 = 90%). There was no significant association between race and chemotherapy dosing. Due to overlap between studies assessing the relationship between race and completion of chemotherapy, we conducted two separate analyses. Black patients were significantly more likely to discontinue chemotherapy, however, this was no longer statistically significant when larger numbers of patients with more advanced (stage III) breast cancer were included.ConclusionsThese results suggest that black breast cancer patients experience clinically relevant delays in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy more often than white patients, which may in part explain the increased mortality observed among black patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据