4.2 Editorial Material

Making the Strongest Argument: Reply to Pepperberg (2015)

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
卷 129, 期 2, 页码 202-203

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0038721

关键词

invisible displacement; object permanence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jaakkola (2014) argued that because the majority of studies of animals' understanding of invisible displacement did not adequately control for the use of alternative lower-level strategies, clear and solid evidence for a conceptual understanding of invisible displacement existed only for great apes. Pepperberg (2015) takes issue with this conclusion with respect to Grey parrots. While I agree that olfactory and social cueing may not be issues of concern for parrots, I reiterate the need for a study that adequately controls for associative learning before we can confidently claim that parrots understand invisible displacement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据