4.5 Article

High ACAT1 expression in estrogen receptor negative basal-like breast cancer cells is associated with LDL-induced proliferation

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 661-670

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0594-8

关键词

Basal-like breast cancer; Lipid droplets; Cholesterol; ACAT1; CAV1

类别

资金

  1. Clarian Values Fund for Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specific role of dietary fat in breast cancer progression is unclear, although a low-fat diet was associated with decreased recurrence of estrogen receptor alpha negative (ER-) breast cancer. ER- basal-like MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 breast cancer cell lines contained a greater number of cytoplasmic lipid droplets compared to luminal ER+ MCF-7 cells. Therefore, we studied lipid storage functions in these cells. Both triacylglycerol and cholesteryl ester (CE) concentrations were higher in the ER- cells, but the ability to synthesize CE distinguished the two types of breast cancer cells. Higher baseline, oleic acid- and LDL-stimulated CE concentrations were found in ER- compared to ER+ cells. The differences corresponded to greater mRNA and protein levels of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1), higher ACAT activity, higher caveolin-1 protein levels, greater LDL uptake, and lower de novo cholesterol synthesis in ER- cells. Human LDL stimulated proliferation of ER- MDA-MB-231 cells, but had little effect on proliferation of ER+ MCF-7 cells. The functional significance of these findings was demonstrated by the observation that the ACAT inhibitor CP-113,818 reduced proliferation of breast cancer cells, and specifically reduced LDL-induced proliferation of ER- cells. Taken together, our studies show that a greater ability to take up, store and utilize exogenous cholesterol confers a proliferative advantage to basal-like ER- breast cancer cells. Differences in lipid uptake and storage capability may at least partially explain the differential effect of a low-fat diet on human breast cancer recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据