4.5 Article

Genomic screening for genes upregulated by demethylation revealed novel targets of epigenetic silencing in breast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 699-710

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0600-1

关键词

DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Gene expression

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  2. Japan Society for Promotion of Science
  3. Third-term Comprehensive 10-year Strategy for Cancer Control
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer arises through the accumulation of multiple genetic alterations and epigenetic changes such as methylation, which silences gene expression in a variety of cancers. In the present study, we applied genomic screening to identify genes upregulated by the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC) in a human breast cancer cell line (MCF7). We identified 288 genes upregulated and 29 genes downregulated more than fivefold after treatment with DAC, and gene ontology analyses revealed the genes to be involved in immune responses, apoptosis, and cell differentiation. In addition, real-time PCR analysis of ten genes silenced in MCF7 cells confirmed that they are upregulated by DAC, while bisulfite-pyrosequencing analysis confirmed that nine of those genes were silenced by methylation. We also found that treating MCF7 cells with DAC restored induction of DFNA5 by p53, as well as by two other p53 family genes, p63 gamma and p73 beta. Introduction of NTN4 into MCF7 cells suppressed cell growth, indicating that NTN4 has tumor suppressive activity. In primary breast cancers, we detected cancer-specific methylation of NTN4, PGP9.5, and DKK3, suggesting that methylation of these genes could be useful markers for diagnosis of breast cancer. Thus, DNA methylation appears to be a common event in breast cancer, and the genes silenced by methylation could be useful targets for both diagnosis and therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据