4.5 Article

Patterns of recurrence of early breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a therapeutic target for a quarter of a century

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 319-324

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0282-0

关键词

Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Estrogen receptor; Hormonal therapy

类别

资金

  1. West Swedish Breast Cancer Group
  2. Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  3. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
  4. Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group (ANZ BCTG)
  5. Groote Shuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
  6. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  7. Swedish Cancer Society
  8. The Cancer Council Australia
  9. National Health Medical Research Council of Australia
  10. Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation
  11. US-National Cancer Institute [CA-75362]
  12. Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA)
  13. Foundation of Clinical Cancer Research of Eastern Switzerland (OSKK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current therapeutic strategy in breast cancer is to identify a target, such as estrogen receptor (ER) status, for tailoring treatments. We investigated the patterns of recurrence with respect to ER status for patients treated in two randomized trials with 25 years' median follow-up. In the ER-negative subpopulations most breast cancer events occurred within the first 5-7 years after randomization, while in the ER-positive subpopulations breast cancer events were spread through 10 years. In the ER-positive subpopulation, 1 year endocrine treatment alone significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) with no additional benefit observed by adding 1 year of chemotherapy. In the small ER-negative subpopulation chemo-endocrine therapy had a significantly better DFS than endocrine alone or no treatment. Despite small numbers of patients, old-fashioned treatments, and competing causes of treatment failure, the value of ER status as a target for response to adjuvant treatment is evident through prolonged follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据