4.5 Article

Cyclopamine inhibition of human breast cancer cell growth independent of Smoothened (Smo)

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 115, 期 3, 页码 505-521

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0093-3

关键词

Mammary cancer; Hedgehog signaling; Breast cancer treatment; Targeted therapy

类别

资金

  1. Department of Defense IDEA Award [DAMD17-00-1-0477]
  2. SPORE Developmental Project Grant [P50 CA50183]
  3. National Institutes of Health [P01-CA30195]
  4. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P01HD038129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA030195, R01CA127857, R01CA050183] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered hedgehog signaling is implicated in the development of approximately 20-25% of all cancers, especially those of soft tissues. Genetic evidence in mice as well as immunolocalization studies in human breast cancer specimens suggest that deregulated hedgehog signaling may contribute to breast cancer development. Indeed, two recent studies demonstrated that anchorage-dependent growth of some human breast cancer cell lines is impaired by cyclopamine, a potent hedgehog signaling antagonist targeting the Smoothened (SMO) protein. However, specificity of cyclopamine at the dosage required for growth inhibition (a parts per thousand yen10 mu M) remained an open question. In this paper we demonstrate that hedgehog signaling antagonists, including cyclopamine, and a second compound, CUR0199691, can inhibit growth of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative tumorigenic breast cancer cells at elevated doses. However, our results indicate that, for most breast cancer cell lines, growth inhibition by these compounds can be independent of detectable Smo gene expression. Rather, our results suggest that cyclopamine and CUR0199691 have unique secondary molecular targets at the dosages required for growth inhibition that are unrelated to hedgehog signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据