4.5 Article

The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 53-68

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0081-7

关键词

Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Post-therapy proliferation

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Now [BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRE] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To compare the prognostic significance of proliferation, as assessed by Ki67 expression, in breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective search of a prospectively maintained clinical database was performed to identify patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The expression of Ki67 was assessed using immunohistochemistry in pre-therapy core-needle biopsy and post-therapy surgical excision specimens. The following factors were considered pre- and post-chemotherapy for their relationship with relapse-free and overall survival: age, menstrual status, T and N stage, pre-therapy operability, Ki67, ER, PgR, HER2, grade, histological subtype, vascular invasion, clinical response, chemotherapy regimen, type of surgery performed, adjuvant therapy, pathological tumour size and nodal involvement. Results In a matched cohort of 103 patients, on multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival, post-therapy Ki67 was the only significant independent prognostic factor. On multivariate analysis for overall survival, both pre- and excision Ki67 were significant independent predictors but the latter showed a stronger prognostic impact. The highest and lowest tertiles of excision Ki67 had different prognosis for both 5-year relapse-free (27% vs. 77%) and overall (39% and 93%) survival. In a cohort of 284 patients with only excision samples, post-therapy Ki67 was a significant independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Post-chemotherapy Ki67 is a strong predictor of outcome for patients not achieving a pathological complete response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据