4.5 Article

The biological information obtainable from circulating tumor cells

期刊

BREAST
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 S38-S40

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9776(09)70270-X

关键词

CTCs; Breast cancer; Prognosis; HER-2; Stem cells

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliable detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is possible by using immunomagnetic separation and subsequent characterization with the CellSpotter (TM) analyzer (Veridex LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Warren, NJ, USA). This technology is becoming a standard tool for the 'real-time' assessment of prognosis and response to treatment. The prognostic value is independent of the line of therapy (e.g. first-line versus second-line or more), site of metastasis (e. g. visceral versus soft tissue/bone), and subtype of disease (e. g. basal vs. luminal). Moreover, CTCs detection has been recently associated with worse outcome also in patients with primary breast cancer that have completed neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. These findings suggest the need to further investigate the biology of CTCs. Several investigators have recently focused on determining the feasibility of performing the genotypic characterization of CTCs and correlate it with the expression of similar genes in primary or metastatic lesions. Some of the studies have used a recently introduced detection technology combining EpCAM-enrichment and PCR analysis (AdnaTest Breast Cancer, Adnagen AG, Germany). The studies seem to indicate that CTCs differ in the expression of hormone receptors and HER-2 compared to primary disease. Furthermore, some of the phenotypic assessment seems to suggest that a fraction of CTCs could be identified as cancer stem cells. Those data suggest interesting observations in the biology of those cells and indicate the possibility to evaluate targeted therapies based on the genomic profiling of CTCs, particularly with regards to HER-2 determination. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据