4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Brain Size and Limits to Adult Neurogenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 524, 期 3, 页码 646-664

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23896

关键词

neuronal replacement; regional specification; brain evolution; comparative neuroanatomy; plasticity

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [NS28478, HD032116]
  2. California Regenerative Medicine Clinical Fellowship
  3. National Research Service Award, National Institutes of Health Fellowship [F32MH103003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The walls of the cerebral ventricles in the developing embryo harbor the primary neural stem cells from which most neurons and glia derive. In many vertebrates, neurogenesis continues postnatally and into adulthood in this region. Adult neurogenesis at the ventricle has been most extensively studied in organisms with small brains, such as reptiles, birds, and rodents. In reptiles and birds, these progenitor cells give rise to young neurons that migrate into many regions of the forebrain. Neurogenesis in adult rodents is also relatively widespread along the lateral ventricles, but migration is largely restricted to the rostral migratory stream into the olfactory bulb. Recent work indicates that the wall of the lateral ventricle is highly regionalized, with progenitor cells giving rise to different types of neurons depending on their location. In species with larger brains, young neurons born in these spatially specified domains become dramatically separated from potential final destinations. Here we hypothesize that the increase in size and topographical complexity (e.g., intervening white matter tracts) in larger brains may severely limit the long-term contribution of new neurons born close to, or in, the ventricular wall. We compare the process of adult neuronal birth, migration, and integration across species with different brain sizes, and discuss how early regional specification of progenitor cells may interact with brain size and affect where and when new neurons are added.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据