3.8 Article

TROPHIC GROUPS OF DEMERSAL FISH OF SANTOS BAY AND ADJACENT CONTINENTAL SHELF, SAO PAULO STATE, BRAZIL: TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL COMPARISONS

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 89-102

出版社

INST OCEANOGRAFICO, UNIV SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.1590/S1679-87592014045906202

关键词

Diet; Stomach content; Marine fish; Teleostei; Elasmobranchii; Southeastern Brazil

资金

  1. State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP/PRONEX) [2003/09932-1]
  2. FAPESP [06/56974-0, 2007/03252-0]
  3. CNPq [150 422/2005-9]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [03/09932-1] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temporal and spatial variations of feeding habits and trophic groups of demersal fish species of Santos Bay and the adjacent continental shelf were investigated. The samples were taken in September 2005 and March 2006 by bottom otter trawling. The stomach content analysis of 2,328 specimens of 49 species showed most fish fed on a large range of food items but relied heavily on shrimp, crabs/swimming-crabs, amphipods, mysids, polychaetes, ophiuroids, squids, and teleosteans. The species were classified into ten trophic groups. Shrimp were an important food source in the Santos bay and inner shelf, while ophiuroids were important prey for predators of the middle shelf. Many species relied on crabs/swimming-crabs during the summer, especially on the middle shelf. The spatial and temporal variability in food resource utilization by fish were related to the pattern of distribution and abundance of their prey. The predation on shrimp and crabs/swimming-crabs seems to be related to the water mass dynamics of the region. Intraspecific comparisons demonstrated that most of the species display spatial and/or temporal variation in their diet. The demersal ichtyofauna can also be divided into the more general categories of piscivores, nektonic invertebrate feeders, benthic invertebrate feeders and planktonic invertebrate feeders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据