4.1 Article

SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCT (SMP) CHARACTERIZATION IN BENCH-SCALE AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC CSTRS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 101-111

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1590/S0104-66322010000100009

关键词

Biological wastewater treatment; Soluble microbial products; Residual COD; Volatile fatty acids; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. FAPEMIG [TEC-961-06]
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq
  4. UFOP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents results on the production and characterization (by both mass spectrometry and conventional chemical analyses) of Soluble Microbial Products (SMP) that accumulated in aerobic and anaerobic bench scale completely stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) fed with glucose or acetate under different hydraulic retention times (HRT) and temperatures. SMP accumulation varied from 2 to 68% of the influent COD in the aerobic reactor and from 9 to 27% in the anaerobic reactor and increased with the decrease in temperature and with the HRT reduction in the aerobic reactor. On the other hand, in the anaerobic reactor, the organic loading rate and the temperature had little impact on SMP production, implying that the SMP originated from different mechanisms in each system. For both reactors, a higher accumulation of SMPs was observed as the substrate was acetate when compared to glucose, and the chemical analysis showed that the majority of the SMP did not seem to be proteins or carbohydrates. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the mass spectra from positive and negative mode electron-spray ionization (LC-IT-TOF-MS) and results from matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) confirmed the chemical analyses and showed the absence of proteins in the effluents and the predominance of low molecular weight SMP. The PCA analysis also showed that the majority of the SMP from aerobic and anaerobic reactors did not seem to originate from soluble extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) or cell lysis products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据