3.9 Article

Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Gerbera jamesonii Bolus and Hook (Asteraceae)

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1121-1125

出版社

INT INST ECOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842009000500016

关键词

Gerbera; biology; fertility life table; two-spotted spider mite

类别

资金

  1. Fundo de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Maranhao - FAPEMA
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus and Hook,) is an ornamental Asteraceae of great commercial value, and pests can affect adversely its cultivation. More than 20 species of arthropods cause economic damage on gerbera, among them the two spotted mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, 1836 (Acari: Tetranychidae), considered a key pest for this and other ornamental plants. In this work, some life-cycle aspects of T urticae on gerbera, considered important for the knowledge of its population dynamics and for pest management programs, were studied. Mites were reared on 3-cm diameter arenas of gerbera leaf discs maintained on distilled water in Petri dishes, under laboratory conditions of 25 degrees C, 70 +/- 10% RU and 14-hour photophase, with only one egg left per arena, in a total of 262 arenas. Egg viability was 96.5% and 97.1% for unmated and mated females, respectively. Unmated females originated larvae which lived for 3.2 days and the stages of protonymph and deutonymph, 1.9 and 1.6 days, respectively; those from mated females lived 3.5 days and for protonymphs and deutonymphs, 2.0 and 1.6 days, respectively. Except for the duration of one generation (T), with similar values, 18.6 and 19.7 days, respectively for Unmated and mated females, the net reproductive rate of increase (R-0), the innate capacity to increase in number (r(m)) and the finite rate of growth (lambda) were different for mated and unmated females, respectively 11.5 and 24.6 for R-0 0. 12 and 0.17 for r(m) and 1.13 and 1.19 for lambda.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据