3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Diversity of parasites of fish from the Upper Parana River floodplain, Brazil

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 691-705

出版社

INT INST ECOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842009000300023

关键词

ichthyoparasites; biodiversity; helminthes; crustaceans; parasite ecology

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to provide a current survey of the species of parasites found in the Upper Parana River floodplain, as well as to investigate which strategies and mechanisms used by parasites, are favored and which environmental factors influence the parasite community in the studied environments. During a seven-year period from February 2000 to September 2007, 3,768 fish belonging to 72 species were collected and analyzed for the purpose of studying the parasite fauna. A total of 337 species of parasites were reported, including 12 new descriptions: one myxosporid, Henneguya paranaensis Eiras, Pavanelli and Takemoto, 2004; eight monogeneans, Kritskyia annakohnae Boeger, Tanaka and Pavanelli, 200 1; Kritskyia boegeri Takemoto, Lizama and Pavanelli, 2002; Kritskyia eirasi Guidelli, Takemoto and Pavanelli, 2003; Demidospermus labrosi Franca, Isaac, Pavanelli and Takemoto, 2003; Demidospermus mandi Franca, Isaac, Pavanelli and Takemoto, 2003; Pseudovancleaveus paranaensis Fran a, Isaac, Pavanelli and Takemoto, 2003; Tereancistrum curimba Lizama, Takemoto and Pavanelli, 2004 and Tereancistrum toksonum Lizama, Takemoto and Pavanelli, 2004: two digeneans, Sanguinicola platyrhynchi Guidelli, Isaac and Pavanelli, 2002 and Dadayius pacupeva Lacerda, Takemoto and Pavanelli, 2003 and one cestode, Nomimoscolex pertierrae Chambrier. Takemoto and Pavanelli, 2005. In addition, several other species were reported for the first time in new hosts or in the floodplain. Monogeneans presented the highest number of species, followed by digeneans. The infection site with the highest species richness was the intestine, with 127 species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据